Page 5 of 17

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by Toldyouso
From the Chicago Sun-Times:
“No one was in custody in either shooting. There have been at least eight other mass shootings in Chicago this month.”

Have ANY of these mass shootings been reported by CNN, let alone with the same breathlessness of the Pulse nightclub shooting?

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by AV8R
No, because the very fact that they are happening in a long time Democratic stronghold with strict gun control laws serves to undermine the whole narrative.

If this were a red city in Texas you can bet it would be on the news daily with all the pearl clutching the Democratic state media machine could muster.

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by RPlant
AV8R wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 4:07 pm No, because the very fact that they are happening in a long time Democratic stronghold with strict gun control laws serves to undermine the whole narrative.

If this were a red city in Texas you can bet it would be on the news daily with all the pearl clutching the Democratic state media machine could muster.
Yep, nothing to do with Red State Indiana and gun runner alley right into the Southside of Chicago.

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by Tazewell
RPlant wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 6:31 pm Yep, nothing to do with Red State Indiana and gun runner alley right into the Southside of Chicago.
+1 on the Disinformation Tracker.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/07/ ... -gun-myth/
The tragically incompetent mayor of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot, appeared on CNN’s State of the Union this weekend to deflect attention from the horror show unfolding in her city by blaming interlopers for its spiking murder rate: “We are being inundated with guns from states that have virtually no gun control, no background checks, no ban on assault weapons — that is hurting cities like Chicago.”

Although these accusations have leveled by Chicago politicians for decades now, they are a myth.

For one thing, there is no state in the nation with “virtually no gun control” or “no background checks.” Every time anyone in the United States purchases a gun from a federal firearms licensee (FFL) — a gun store, a gun show, it doesn’t matter — the seller runs a background check on the buyer through the NICS (National Instant Criminal Background Check System) database. In some cases, the FFL checks to see if the buyer has passed a background check via a state-issued concealed-carry permit. In states that allow individual private sales, it is illegal to knowingly sell to anyone who you believe is obtaining a firearm for criminal purposes.

Those who cross state lines to buy guns undergo the same background check, and the sale is processed by an FFL in the buyer’s home state. The exact same laws apply to all online sales.

The vast majority of Americans obtain their guns in this manner, and they rarely commit crimes. Around 7 percent of criminals in prison bought weapons using their real names. Fewer than 1 percent obtained them at gun shows. As the Heritage Foundation’s Amy Swearer points out, there have been around 18 million concealed-carry permit holders over the past 15 years, and they have committed 801 firearm-related homicides over that span, or somewhere around 0.7 percent of all firearm-related murders. Concealed-carry holders not only are more law-abiding than the general population as a group; they are more law-abiding than law enforcement.

Studies of those imprisoned on firearms charges show that most often they obtain their weapons by stealing them or buying them in black markets. A smaller percentage get them from family members or friends.

On top of all this, federal law requires every FFL license holder to report the purchase of two or more handguns by the same person with a week to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. This is one of the reasons straw purchasers — people with a clean record who buy for criminals — spread their operations to other states. This is not unique to Illinois or Chicago. It has nothing to do with strict or lenient laws. It has mostly to do with cities and states failing to prosecute straw purchases.

Lightfoot claims that 60 percent of the guns used in Chicago murders are bought from out of state. I assume she is relying on 2017’s suspect “gun trace report,” which looked at guns confiscated in criminal acts from 2013 and 2016. Even if we trusted the city’s data, most guns used in Illinois crimes are bought in-state. If gun laws in Illinois — which earns a grade of “A-“ from the pro-gun-control Gifford Law Center, tied for second highest in the country after New Jersey — are more effective than gun laws in Missouri, Wisconsin, or Indiana, why is it that FFL dealers in suburban Cook County are the origin point for a third of the crime guns recovered in Chicago, and home to “seven of the top ten source dealers”? According to the trace study, 11.2 percent of all crime guns recovered in Chicago could be tracked to just two gun shops.

The only reason, it seems, criminals take the drive to Indiana is because local gun shops are tapped out. There is a tremendous demand for weapons in Chicago. That’s not Mississippi’s fault. And Lightfoot’s contention only proves that criminals in her city can get their hands on guns rather easily, while most law-abiding citizens have no way to defend themselves.

Lightfoot may also be surprised to learn that California borders on states with liberal gun laws, such as Arizona, Nevada, and Oregon. Yet no big city in California has quite the murder and criminality of Chicago. New York borders on states with liberal gun laws, such as Vermont, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire. Yet NYC’s murder rate is only fraction of Chicago’s. Texas gets an “F” from Gifford Law Center, yet Houston and Dallas have murder rates that are half of that in Chicago. The rates in Austin and El Paso are tiny when compared to Chicago.

Then, of course, the “assault-weapons bans” that Lightfoot brings up have absolutely no bearing on Chicago’s murder rate, even if such prohibitions actually worked. There were 864 murders in the state of Illinois in 2018 (the last year for which the FBI has full stats). Of homicides where the type of weapon is reported by law enforcement, 592 were perpetrated using handguns, 14 with rifles, and four with shotguns. Over 100 murders were committed using knives, other cutting instruments, hands, feet, and other types of weapons. And of the 14 “rifles” used, it’s almost surely the case that not all of them were “assault weapons.” Among the illegal guns recovered by Chicago law enforcement in 2018, 12,220 were handguns of some kind and 1,769 were rifles and shotguns.

In the states in Illinois’s neighborhood with no bans on “assault weapons,” the number of murders committed with a “rifle” is correspondingly small — ten in Indiana, eight in Tennessee, six in Kentucky, four in Wisconsin, and three in Mississippi.

It’s also worth pointing out that gun homicides dropped sharply in most cities after the national “assault weapons” expired in 2004, even though the AR-15 would correspondingly become one of the most popular weapons in the country. The AR-15 is an excellent home-defense weapon, but long guns aren’t conducive to criminality, despite what we see in movies. Tragically, AR-15s are often favored by psychotic mass shooters, but rarely by the murderers who plague Lightfoot’s city.

It keeps getting worse. Nearly 400 people have already been murdered in Chicago this year, around 100 more than in the entire year of 2019. On the night of May 29, 25 people were murdered and another 85 wounded by gunfire, more than any day in 60 years. And yet the mayor is appearing on TV to blame Mississippi and Texas. It is far more likely that black-market guns find their way to Chicago because the place has been a poorly run criminal mecca for decades.

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by CCubs
Oh my God, RPlant. You just got a mark on the [deleted by mod] tracker!!! Aren't you worried? HE IS the Judge, Jury, and Executioner!🏛⚖🔨

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by Tazewell

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by AV8R
CCubs wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 6:58 pm Oh my God, RPlant. You just got a mark on the nut jobs tracker!!! Aren't you worried? HE IS the Judge, Jury, and Executioner!🏛⚖🔨
@Tazewell when THAT ^^ is the only response that CCubs can muster to the article you posted on the topic, you've won the argument.

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by Tazewell
AV8R wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 7:23 pm @Tazewell when THAT ^^ is the only response that CCubs can muster to the article you posted on the topic, you've won the argument.
Agreed. I am done arguing with him. He will get no more responses from me until he can start making coherent arguments including links to articles, data, or videos to support those arguments.

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by AV8R
Tazewell wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 7:38 pm
AV8R wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 7:23 pm @Tazewell when THAT ^^ is the only response that CCubs can muster to the article you posted on the topic, you've won the argument.
Agreed. I am done arguing with him. He will get no more responses from me until he can start making coherent arguments including links to articles, data, or videos to support those arguments.
We’d all like to see that, but I quit holding my breath long ago.

Re: Mass shooting in Chicago

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:30 pm
by CCubs
Awww, gee, guys please give me another chance.
There never was a real argument.
Links and videos are all over the internet. Doctored!!