So it supports the statement regarding @AV8R's behavior. Thanks.Gandalf wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 4:40 am [REMOVED BY MODERATOR] I WENT BACK TO DELETE THEORIGINAL POST YOU QUOTED AS WELL BUT INSTEAD FOUND IT HAD BEEN DELETED BY AV8R WITHIN HOURS OF WRITING IT. YOU MUST HAVE DONE SOME EDITING FROM THE REPLY OF RPLANT THAT QUOTED IT. EITHER WAY IT'S INAPPROPRIATE IN THIS MODERATED FORUM.
viewtopic.php?p=34005#p34005
Rename this page
You mean its not the flu!?!
It's called the Socratic Method. Of course it doesn't work if one side is dishonest and/or evasive like you.DennisinPeoria wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:22 am I've also given up trying to argue with others here, because I can't change their mind; and despite whatever Tazewell's reason for continued questioning I won't change my mind.
Or maybe you like to try to play police interrogation. Try a new tack.Tazewell wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:44 amIt's called the Socratic Method. Of course it doesn't work if one side is dishonest and/or evasive like you.DennisinPeoria wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:22 am I've also given up trying to argue with others here, because I can't change their mind; and despite whatever Tazewell's reason for continued questioning I won't change my mind.
You mean its not the flu!?!
Yep, I admitted it as past behavior. You must have ignored that post.RPlant wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:26 amSo it supports the statement regarding @AV8R's behavior. Thanks.Gandalf wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 4:40 am [REMOVED BY MODERATOR] I WENT BACK TO DELETE THEORIGINAL POST YOU QUOTED AS WELL BUT INSTEAD FOUND IT HAD BEEN DELETED BY AV8R WITHIN HOURS OF WRITING IT. YOU MUST HAVE DONE SOME EDITING FROM THE REPLY OF RPLANT THAT QUOTED IT. EITHER WAY IT'S INAPPROPRIATE IN THIS MODERATED FORUM.
viewtopic.php?p=34005#p34005
JD Vance for President 2028
Why are Leftists so thin skinned? Asking someone to defend their position is akin to a police interrogation?RPlant wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 12:16 pmOr maybe you like to try to play police interrogation. Try a new tack.Tazewell wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:44 amIt's called the Socratic Method. Of course it doesn't work if one side is dishonest and/or evasive like you.DennisinPeoria wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:22 am I've also given up trying to argue with others here, because I can't change their mind; and despite whatever Tazewell's reason for continued questioning I won't change my mind.
Past behavior?,.......as in yesterday?AV8R wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 12:18 pmYep, I admitted it as past behavior. You must have ignored that post.RPlant wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:26 amSo it supports the statement regarding @AV8R's behavior. Thanks.Gandalf wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 4:40 am [REMOVED BY MODERATOR] I WENT BACK TO DELETE THEORIGINAL POST YOU QUOTED AS WELL BUT INSTEAD FOUND IT HAD BEEN DELETED BY AV8R WITHIN HOURS OF WRITING IT. YOU MUST HAVE DONE SOME EDITING FROM THE REPLY OF RPLANT THAT QUOTED IT. EITHER WAY IT'S INAPPROPRIATE IN THIS MODERATED FORUM.
viewtopic.php?p=34005#p34005
People don't care how much you know.
They want to know how much you care.
They want to know how much you care.